diff --git a/content/u/blog/love-letter-to-isc-bind/contents.lr b/content/u/blog/love-letter-to-isc-bind/contents.lr
index 83a32cc..bef01b7 100644
--- a/content/u/blog/love-letter-to-isc-bind/contents.lr
+++ b/content/u/blog/love-letter-to-isc-bind/contents.lr
@@ -33,10 +33,11 @@ incorrect entries? I had so much trust in you and then that!
 
 Years passed and after my shock, I had a fling with
 [djbdns](https://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html) (together with qmail and
-daemontools). Which right away took security more serious. So
-serious that even managing djbdns with its own suite was almost like a
-crypto analysis adventure. Many years this was my software solution of
-choice, compiled by source, patched by hand. Oh, the old 2000's!
+daemontools). Which right away took security more serious. So serious
+that even managing djbdns with its own suite was almost like a crypto
+analysis adventure (no offense, Dan!). Many years this was my software
+solution of choice, compiled by source, patched by hand. Oh, the old
+2000's!
 
 Over time the effort for managing software by source code and
 /usr/local installations did not turn out to be very efficient. So I
@@ -44,7 +45,8 @@ looked around and found [powerdns](https://www.powerdns.com/),
 [nsd](https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/nsd/about/) and
 [unbound](https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/about/).
 
-I settled for the nsd/unbound combination for many years. Then I
+I settled for the nsd/unbound combination for many years. Solid, easy
+to use and nice separation of concerns. Thanks nlnetlabs! Then I
 stumbled upon
 [dnsmasq](http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html). Dnsmasq
 feels a bit like a younger sibling of bind: it does everything and