132 lines
3.4 KiB
Text
132 lines
3.4 KiB
Text
2.1.0 behaviour:
|
|
|
|
|
|
__git foo
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
|
|
__git bar
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
|
|
|
|
require="__git/foo" __git bar:
|
|
|
|
__git bar
|
|
__git foo
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
__git foo <---|
|
|
__package git --state present ---|
|
|
|
|
-> detects circular dependency
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
require="__apt_repository/somewhere-where-you-can-find-package-git __git/foo" __git bar
|
|
|
|
__git bar
|
|
__apt_repository somewhere-where-you-can-find-package-git
|
|
|
|
__git foo
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
__package_apt git depends nachher auf __apt_repository
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
__git foo <---|
|
|
__package git --state present ---|
|
|
__apt_repository somewhere-where-you-can-find-package-git
|
|
|
|
possible solutions:
|
|
- __package git does not depend on __git foo (clear dependency)
|
|
- because it DOES NOT depend on it!
|
|
- but we don't know whether this is always true :-/
|
|
- multiple instances of __package git exist, with
|
|
- different required BY
|
|
- different requirements
|
|
- define non inheritent dependencies (?)
|
|
- because __git bar really depends only on __git foo
|
|
- proposal: introduce require_non_recursive and require_recursive (previously: require)
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
__package foo
|
|
__package_apt foo
|
|
|
|
__package bar
|
|
__package_apt bar
|
|
|
|
require="__package/foo" __package bar
|
|
|
|
__package bar
|
|
__package foo
|
|
__package_apt foo
|
|
__package_apt bar
|
|
__package foo
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
__type1 var1
|
|
__type2 FIX
|
|
|
|
__type1 var2
|
|
__type2 FIX
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
facts:
|
|
- use is different from require="", as use makes USED depend on parent deps
|
|
- use = called/defined in the manifest of a type
|
|
- it is currently not recorded, where an object gained its requirements and autorequirements
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
requirements:
|
|
- a type should be a black box:
|
|
I can require an object and it is ensured,
|
|
everything it needs is executed before me.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
possible implementations
|
|
- requiring it should include everything it USES
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
solutions:
|
|
__type1 DEPENDS but does not use __type2 FIX
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Change proposal:
|
|
|
|
Each object only depends on the objects it directly requires, tree build to
|
|
ensure correct running behaviour:
|
|
|
|
|
|
__git bar
|
|
__git foo
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
|
|
__git foo
|
|
__package git --state present
|
|
|
|
Order:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
__package/git (leaf node!)
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
__git/foo (new leaf node!)
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
__git/bar (new leaf node!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
For __package:
|
|
|
|
__sometype bar
|
|
__package foo
|
|
|
|
__package foo
|
|
__package_apt foo
|
|
|
|
1) __package_apt/foo (leaf node)
|
|
|
|
2) __package/foo (new leaf node)
|
|
|
|
3) __sometype/bar (new leaf node)
|