From b786fa275ab89f31ba4ec1a32ec4240f516ac551 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nico Schottelius Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 14:45:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [ipv6vpn/hackerspaces] ++ minor changes --- content/u/blog/free-ipv6-vpn-for-hackerspaces/contents.lr | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/u/blog/free-ipv6-vpn-for-hackerspaces/contents.lr b/content/u/blog/free-ipv6-vpn-for-hackerspaces/contents.lr index cc2975b..a38bc3a 100644 --- a/content/u/blog/free-ipv6-vpn-for-hackerspaces/contents.lr +++ b/content/u/blog/free-ipv6-vpn-for-hackerspaces/contents.lr @@ -75,10 +75,13 @@ there and that is a good thing. The reasons why we opted for a * wireguard: it's very easy and slim and does not require IPv4 inside the tunnel ([which OpenVPN still - does](https://ungleich.ch/en-us/cms/blog/2019/09/10/openvpn-vs-wireguard/)) + does](https://ungleich.ch/en-us/cms/blog/2019/09/10/openvpn-vs-wireguard/)). Also + it works on "almost any device" including Linux, BSD and niche OS + like Windows, macos, iOS and Android. * VPN: work with dynamic IPs, works behind CGNAT -(feel free to challenge this decision in a discussion on IPv6.chat) +(feel free to challenge this decision in a discussion on +[IPv6.chat](https://IPv6.chat)) ## Getting IPv6 for a hackerspace