\chapter{\label{summary}Conclusion and Outlook} %** Summary.tex: What have you achieved, what have you presented in this % document. What are the highlights of your work. % It should conclude by a conclusion. % General / Review The objective of implementing high speed NAT64 in P4 has been achieved. The implementation at hand has been shown to be portable between 2 different P4 targets. It should be portable with minor target specific changes to faster hardware to support NAT64 at much higher line speeds, without any logic changes. Our algorithm uses the IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Address~\cite{rfc4291} to embed IPv4 addresses. However RFC6052~\cite{rfc6052} defines different embeddings depending on the prefix size. A future version should support these schemes to be compatible to other implementations. PMTU handling error cases No fragmentation No address / mac learning supporting migration to IPv6 only networks % P4 P4 has been proven for us as a suitable programming language for network equipment with great potential. However in the current state the tooling and frameworks are still immature and need significant work to become usable for solving day-to-day challenges or supporting large scale projects. Even with the current state drawbacks, P4 is a very convincing language that has wide range of applications due to its protocol independence and easy to understand architecture. % NetPFGA The NetFPGA platform is a good showcase for the capabilities of P4, demonstrating almost line speed P4 programs. However the supporting code immaturity, logging ambiguity and enormous complexity of the development process. Very time intensive development due to usability problems and uncertainty of functionality (compare sections \ref{results:netpfga:usability} and \ref{results:netpfga:stability}). While the port to NetPFGA was significantly more effort then expected, the learnings of the different layers were very much appreciated / liked % Outlook OUTLOOK What are the consequences of your work for future work? The availability of protocol independent programmable network equipment opens up many possibilities for in network programming. While this thesis focused on NAT64, the accompanying technology DNS64~\cite{rfc6147} could also be implemented in P4, thus completing the translation mechanism. Proxies / higher level protocols could be next level Add helper in P4 to support checksum analysis a frequent problem and helper Allow ICMP6 option parsing: specify xtimes 64 bit blocks resulting in an array Adding support for passing on meta information to controller: key or table Support a meta language to define used types and/or export to popular languages. Long term supporting python3 would be helpful. P4OS. - react on FIN/RST (?) -- could be an addition P4os - reusable code Future work: session handling