From 0fbe5356e53a33d91e20f387fc695c84ebb17023 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Schottelius <nico@ikn.schottelius.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:09:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] add topic headers

Signed-off-by: Nico Schottelius <nico@ikn.schottelius.org>
---
 blog/lighttpd-plone-rewrite-redirect.mdwn |  4 ++++
 docs/the-term-foss.mdwn                   | 13 ++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/blog/lighttpd-plone-rewrite-redirect.mdwn b/blog/lighttpd-plone-rewrite-redirect.mdwn
index 366f1301..d912fe4b 100644
--- a/blog/lighttpd-plone-rewrite-redirect.mdwn
+++ b/blog/lighttpd-plone-rewrite-redirect.mdwn
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ configuration of lighttpd looks like this:
 ([[a more detailled version can be found here|configs/lighttpd-zope-http-and-https]])
 
 
+## The idea
+
 Now I created a new [[about page here|about]] and want to redirect
 the old URLs **"^/ueber/nico-schottelius$"** and **"^/about/nico-schottelius$"**
 from the Plone site to it.
@@ -38,6 +40,8 @@ First I tried the normal redirect like this:
        url.redirect = ( "^/ueber/nico-schottelius$" => "http://www.nico.schottelius.org/about/",
                         "^/about/nico-schottelius$" => "http://www.nico.schottelius.org/about/" )
 
+## The solution
+
 Unfortunately, this did not work. You may already have spotted the bug...
 The correct way to redirect pages from lighttpd in front of
 [Zope](http://www.zope.org), which does ***rewriting*** is to match on the
diff --git a/docs/the-term-foss.mdwn b/docs/the-term-foss.mdwn
index 16e3b95a..c6f6d453 100644
--- a/docs/the-term-foss.mdwn
+++ b/docs/the-term-foss.mdwn
@@ -1,8 +1,15 @@
-[[!meta title="The term FOSS"]]
+[[!meta title="The terms FOSS and the relation to FS, OSS and FLOSS"]]
+
+## Introduction
+
+Today, there are different terms in use to describe ***free*** and
+***open source software***. This article gives you a short overview
+about those terms and a short reason why I prefer to use ***FOSS***.
 
-## Existing terms
 ### Free software
-<br /><a href="http://www.gnu.org/">GNU</a> prefers to use the term "<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">Free software</a>".  The reason for me not to use this term are:<br />
+[GNU](http://www.gnu.org) prefers to use the term
+"<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">Free software</a>".
+The reason for me not to use this term are:<br />
 <ul><li>The abreviation is "FS", which is ambiguous. "FS" is often used as the abreviation for "filesystem".</li><li>The term does not tell you directly, that you also have access to the source (main reason one).</li><li>I think people can easily think free software is just free as in "nothing to pay for it" (main reason two).<br /></li><li>I do not like to pronounce it. Think about "I've like effess." Nothing my tongue likes.<br /></li></ul>
 ### Open source software
 <br />I liked to use the term "<a href="http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php">Open source software</a>"