diff --git a/docs/the-term-foss.mdwn b/docs/the-term-foss.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..156a1b0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/the-term-foss.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+[[!meta title="The term FOSS"]]
+
+## Existing terms
+
+### Free software
+
GNU prefers to use the term "Free software". The reason for me not to use this term are:
+
- The abreviation is "FS", which is ambiguous. "FS" is often used as the abreviation for "filesystem".
- The term does not tell you directly, that you also have access to the source (main reason one).
- I think people can easily think free software is just free as in "nothing to pay for it" (main reason two).
- I do not like to pronounce it. Think about "I've like effess." Nothing my tongue likes.
+### Open source software
+
I liked to use the term "Open source software"
+some time. Perhaps because it was used often to talk about what I
+associate with GPL'ed or BSD-licensed software. But then, one day, I
+found out about the above mentioned GNU free software definition and I
+began to think about both terms. In contrast to free software, open
+source software (OSS) is much more known, but my reasons not to use it
+are:
+- It lacks the "free as in copy it as you like" definition (main reason).
- I think about the "Open sound system", if I read "OSS", which is not what I want to talk about.
+## Free and open source software (FOSS)
+The simplest solution is to combine both terms and finish all problems.
+So using FOSS, I get the following advantages and disadvantages:
+- It is neither an abreviation for "filesystem" nor "open sound system".
- I can pronounce it: "foss."
- It is short and simple and contains everything I love about FOSS.
- Other people may not like it, because I introduce yet another acronym.
- It combines the two terms of both "worlds", so everyone can be happy.