tabulon/cdist
1
0
Fork 0
forked from ungleich-public/cdist
Code Pull requests Activity

Add documentation and mentions for polyglot scripting capabilities for configuring and extending cdist [POLYGLOT]

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Tabulo 2023-04-15 04:50:00 +02:00
parent 9b3505e8a1
commit ae10ff49dd
7 changed files with 673 additions and 67 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

30
docs/src/cdist-explorer.rst
View file

@ -3,12 +3,29 @@ Explorer
Description
-----------
Explorers are small shell scripts, which will be executed on the target
host. The aim of each explorer is to give hints to types on how to act on the
Explorers are small scripts, typically written in POSIX shell,
which will be executed on the target host.
The aim of each explorer is to give hints to types on how to act on the
target system. An explorer outputs the result to stdout, which is usually
a one liner, but may be empty or multi line especially in the case of
type explorers.
.. tip::
An :program:`explorer` can be written in **any scripting language**,
provided it is executable and has a proper **shebang**.
Nevertheless, for explorers, it is usually best to stick with the
**POSIX shell** in order to minimize
requirements on target hosts where they would need to be executed.
For executable shell code, the recommended shebang is :code:`#!/bin/sh -e`.
If an :program:`explorer` lacks `execute` permissions,
:program:`cdist` assumes it to be written in **shell** and executes it using
`$CDIST_REMOTE_SHELL`, which defaults to :code:`/bin/sh -e`.
For more details and examples, see :doc:`cdist-polyglot`.
There are general explorers, which are run in an early stage, and
type explorers. Both work almost exactly the same way, with the difference
that the values of the general explorers are stored in a general location and
@ -32,9 +49,14 @@ error message on stderr, which will cause cdist to abort.
You can also use stderr for debugging purposes while developing a new
explorer.
Examples
--------
A very simple explorer may look like this::
A very simple explorer may look like this:
.. code-block:: sh
#!/bin/sh -e
hostname
@ -44,6 +66,8 @@ A type explorer, which could check for the status of a package may look like thi
.. code-block:: sh
#!/bin/sh -e
if [ -f "$__object/parameter/name" ]; then
name="$(cat "$__object/parameter/name")"
else

13
docs/src/cdist-features.rst
View file

@ -22,8 +22,14 @@ Fast development
Focus on straightforwardness of type creation is a main development objective
Batteries included: A lot of requirements can be solved using standard types
Modern Programming Language
cdist is written in Python
Modern Programming Language (for cdist itself)
cdist itself is written in Python
Language-agnostic / Polyglot (for the rest)
Although cdist itself is written in Python, it can be configured
and extended with any scripting language available.
(The `POSIX shell <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_shell>`_ is recommended, especially for any code destined to run on target hosts)
Requirements, Scalability
No central server needed, cdist operates in push mode and can be run from any computer
@ -44,5 +50,6 @@ UNIX, familiar environment, documentation
Is available as manpages and HTML
UNIX, simplicity, familiar environment
cdist is configured in POSIX shell
The ubiquitious `POSIX shell <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_shell>`_ is the recommended language for configuring and extending cdist.
The :program:`Cdist API` is based on simple and familiar UNIX constructs: environment variables, standard I/O, and files/directories

20
docs/src/cdist-manifest.rst
View file

@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ Manifest
Description
-----------
Manifests are used to define which objects to create.
Manifests are scripts that are executed *locally* (on master)
for the purpose of defining which objects to create.
Objects are instances of **types**, like in object oriented programming languages.
An object is represented by the combination of
**type + slash + object name**: **\__file/etc/cdist-configured** is an
@ -27,7 +29,7 @@ at an example::
These two lines create objects, which will later be used to realise the
configuration on the target host.
Manifests are executed locally as a shell script using **/bin/sh -e**.
Manifests are executed *locally* (on master).
The resulting objects are stored in an internal database.
The same object can be redefined in multiple different manifests as long as
@ -36,6 +38,20 @@ the parameters are exactly the same.
In general, manifests are used to define which types are used depending
on given conditions.
.. tip::
A manifest can be written in **any scripting language**,
provided that the script is executable and has a proper **shebang**.
For executable shell code, the recommended shebang is :code:`#!/bin/sh -e`.
If :program:`manifest` lacks `execute` permissions, :program:`cdist` assumes
it to be written in **shell** and executes it using
`$CDIST_LOCAL_SHELL`, which defaults to :code:`/bin/sh -e`.
For more details and examples, see :doc:`cdist-polyglot`.
.. _cdist-manifest#initial-and-type-manifests:
Initial and type manifests
--------------------------

443
docs/src/cdist-polyglot.rst Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,443 @@
Polyglot
========
Description
-----------
Although **cdist** itself is written in **Python**, it features a
*language-agnostic* (and hence *polyglot*) extension system.
As such, **cdist** can be extended with a mix-and-match of
**any scripting language** in addition to the usual -and recommended-
**POSIX shell** (`sh`): `bash`, `perl`, `python`, `ruby`, `node`, ... whatever.
This is true for all extension mechanisms available for **cdist**, namely:
.. list-table::
* - :doc:`manifests <cdist-manifest>`
- (including :ref:`manifest/init <cdist-manifest#initial-and-type-manifests>`
and :ref:`type manifests <cdist-type#manifest>`)
* - :doc:`explorers <cdist-explorer>`
- (both **global** and :ref:`type explorers <cdist-type#explorers>`)
* - :ref:`gencode-* scripts <cdist-type#gencode-scripts>`
- (both :program:`gencode-local` and :program:`gencode-remote`)
* - and even :ref:`generated code <cdist-type#gencode-scripts>`
- (i.e. the outputs from
:ref:`gencode-* scripts <cdist-type#gencode-scripts>`)
.. raw:: html
<details>
<summary>
<a>You do not have to commit to any single language...</a>
</summary>
.. container::
.. note::
It's indeed possible (though not necessarily recommended)
to **mix-and-match** different
languages when extending **cdist**, for example:
A **type** could, in principal, have a `manifest` and an **explorer** written
in **POSIX shell**, a `gencode-remote` in **Python**
(which could generate code in **POSIX shell**) and a `gencode-local`
in **Perl** (which could generate code in **Perl**,
or some other language), while you are at it...
Just don't expect to submit such a hodge-podge as a candidate for being
distributed with **cdist** itself, though... :-)
especially if it turns out to be something that can be acheieved with
reasonable effort in **POSIX shell**.
In practise, you would at least want to enforce some consistency, if anything for
code maintainibility and your own sanity, in addition to the
the `CAVEATS`_ mentioned down below.
.. raw:: html
</details>
<br/>
Needless to say, just because you *can* do something,
doesn't mean you *should* be doing it, or it's even a *good idea* to do so.
As a general rule of thumb, when extending **cdist**,
there are many good reasons in favor of sticking with the **POSIX shell**
wherever you can, and very few in favor of opting for some other
scripting language.
This is particularly true for any code that is meant to be run *remotely*
on **target hosts** (such as **explorers**),
where it is usually important to keep assumptions and requirements/dependencies
to a bare minimum. See the `CAVEATS`_ down below.
That being said, **polyglot** capabilities of **cdist** can come
quite handy for when you really need this sort of thing,
provided that you are ready to bare the consequences,
including the burden of extra dependecies
--- which is usually not that hard for code run *locally* on **master**
(`manifests`, `gencode-*` scripts, and code generated by `gencode-local`).
In any case, the mere fact of knowing we *can* escape the POSIX hatch
if we really have to, can be quite comforting for those of us suffering
from POSIX claustrophobia... which *is* of course a real health hazard
associated with high anxiety levels and all,
in case you didn't already know... ;-)
Writing polyglot extensions for **cdist**
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Whatever the kind of script (`manifest`, explorer, ...) you are writing,
you need to ensure that all 3 conditions below are met:
1. your script starts with an appropriate **shebang** line, such as::
#!/usr/bin/env bash
.. comment: It would have been nice to make use of an extension
(such as `"sphinx_design"`) which provides a `.. dropdown::`
directive (for toggling visibility) which is the reason for
the ugly `.. raw:: html` stuff below...
.. raw:: html
<details>
<summary><a>It's usually preferable to rely on the <b>env</b> program...</a></summary>
.. container::
It's usually preferable to rely on the :program:`env` program,
like in the example above, to find the interpreter by searching the PATH.
The :program:`env` program is almost guaranteed to exist even on a rudimentary
UNIX/Linux system at a pretty stable location: `/usr/bin/env`
It is, of course, also possible to write down a **hard coded** path
for the interpreter, if you are certain that it will always be
located at that location, like so::
#!/bin/bash
This may sometimes be desirable, for example when you want to ascertain
using a specific version of an interpreter or when you are unsure about
what might get foundthrough the PATH.
.. raw:: html
</details>
2. your script has "*execute*" permissions set (in the Unix/Linux sense),
like so::
chmod a+x /path/to/your/script
This is essentially what matters to **cdist**, which it will take as a
clue for invoking your script *directly* (instead of passing it
to a shell as an argument).
For **generated code**, `cdist` will automatically take care of setting
*execute* permissions for you,
based on the presence of a leading **shebang** within the generated code.
3. the **interpreter** referenced by the **shebang** is available on any host(s)
where your code will run.
.. raw:: html
<details>
<summary>
<a>
Even for the <b>POSIX shell</b>,
it is still recommended to <b>follow the same guidelines</b> outlined above.
</a>
</summary>
.. note::
Even if you are just writing for the **POSIX shell**,
it is still recommended to follow the same guidelines outlined above.
At the very least, make sure your script has a proper **shebang**.
- If you have been following the usual **cdist** advise:
you probably already have a proper **shebang** at the very beginning
of your POSIX shell scripts.
- If (and *only* if), your POSIX shell script *does* contain a proper **shebang**:
you are also encouraged to also give it *"execute"* permissions,
so that your **shebang** will actually get honored.
.. raw:: html
</details>
<br/>
That's pretty much it... except...
.. seealso:: The `CAVEATS`_ below.
CAVEATS
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Shebang and execute permissions
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
In general, the first two conditions above are trivial to satisfy:
Just make sure you put in a **shebang** and mark your script as *executable*.
**Beware**, however, that:
.. attention::
- If your script lacks `execute` permissions (regardless of any **shebang**):
**cdist** will end up passing your script to `/bin/sh -e`
(or to `local_shell` / `remote_shell`,
if one is configured for the current context),
which may or may not be what you want.
- If your script *does* have `execute` permissions but *lacks* a **shebang**:
you can no longer be sure which interpreter (if any) will end up running your script.
What is certain, on the other hand, is that there is a wide range of
different things that could happen in such a case, depending on the OS and the chain
of execution up to that point...
It is possible (but not certain) that, in such a case, your script may
end up getting fed into `/bin/sh` or the default shell
(whatever it happens to be for the current user).
There's even a legend according to which even `csh` may get a chance to feed
on your script, and then proceed to burning your barn...
So, don't do that.
Interpreter availibility
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
For the last condition (interpreter availability),
your mileage may vary for languages other than the **POSIX shell**.
- For scripts meant to be run *locally* on the **master**, things remain relatively easy :
All you may need, if anything,
is a one time installation of stuff.
So, things should be realtively easy when it comes to: :file:`manifest` and :file:`gencode-*` scripts themselves, as well as any code generated by :file:`gencode-local`.
- For scripts meant to be run *remotely* on **target hosts**, things might get quite tricky,
depending on how likely it is
for the desired **interpreter** to be installed by default
on the **target system**.
This is an important concern for :file:`explorer` scripts
and any code generated by :file:`gencode-remote`.
.. warning::
Apart from the POSIX shell (`/bin/sh`), there aren't many interpreters out
there that are likely to have a guaranteed presence on a pristine system.
At the very least, you would have to make sure that the required interpreter
(and any extra modules/libraries your script might depend on)
are indeed available on those host(s)
before your script is invoked...
which kind of goes against the near-zero-dependency philosphy embraced
by **cdist**.
Depending on the target host OS, you might get lucky with
`bash`, `perl`, or `python` being preinstalled.
Even then, those may not necessarily be the version you expect
or have the extra modules/libraries your script might require.
**You have been warned.**
More details
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
As mentioned earlier, **cdist** itself mostly cares about the script
being marked as an *executable*, which it will take as a clue for invoking
that script *directly* (instead of passing it to a shell as an argument).
The **shebang** magic is handled by the usual process `exec` mechanisms
of the host OS (where the script is invoked) that will take over from
that point on.
Here is a simplified summary :
+-------------+---------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| executable? | shebang | invocation resembles | interpreter | remarks |
+=============+===============+==============================+==============+========================================================+
| yes | `#!/bin/sh` | `/path/to/script` | `/bin/sh` | shebang **honored** by OS |
+-------------+---------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| yes | `#!/bin/bash` | `/path/to/script` | `/bin/bash` | shebang **honored** by OS |
+-------------+---------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| yes | | `/path/to/script` | *uncertain* | shebang **absent** |
+-------------+---------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| no | `#!/bin/sh` | `/bin/sh -e /path/to/script` | `/bin/sh -e` | shebang **irrelevant** (as script is not "executable") |
+-------------+---------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| no | `#!/bin/bash` | `/bin/sh -e /path/to/script` | `/bin/sh -e` | shebang **irrelevant** (as script is not "executable") |
+-------------+---------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| no | | `/bin/sh -e /path/to/script` | `/bin/sh -e` | shebang **irrelevant** (as script is not "executable") |
+-------------+---------------+------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------------------+
In fact, it's a little bit more involved than the above. Remember:
- As a special case, for any **generated code** (output by `gencode-*` scripts),
**cdist** will solely rely on the presence (or absence) of a leading **shebang**,
and set the executable bits accordingly, for obvious reasons.
- In the end, if a script is NOT marked as "executable",
it will simply be passed as an argument to the configured shell
that corresponds to the relevant context (i.e. `local_shell` or `remote_shell`),
if one is defined within the **cdist** configuration,
or else to `/bin/sh -e`, as a fallback in in both cases.
Well, there are also some gory implementation details
(related to how environment variables get propagated),
but those should normally have no relevance to this discussion.
The API between **cdist** and any polyglot extensions
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Conceptually, the API, based on well-known UNIX constructs,
remains exactly the same as it is for
any extension written for the **POSIX shell**.
Basically, you are all set as long as your scripting language is capable of:
- accessing **environment variables**;
- reading from and writing to the **filesystem** (files, directories, ...);
- reading from :file:`STDIN` and writing to :file:`STDOUT` (and eventually to :file:`STDERR`)
- **executing** other programs/commands;
- **exiting** with an appropriate **status code** (where 0=>success).
For all we know, no serious scripting language out there
would be missing any such basics.
The actual syntax and mechanisms will obviously be different,
the shell idioms usually being much more concise for this sort of thing,
as expected.
See the below example entitled "`Interacting with the cdist API`_".
Examples
-------------------
Interacting with the cdist API
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
As an API example, here's an excerpt from a **cdist** `type manifest`,
written for the POSIX shell, showing how one would get at the name
of the kernel on the **target host**:::
kernel_name=$(cat "${__global}/explorer/kernel_name")
# ... do something with kernel_name ...
In a nutshell, the above snippet gives the general idea about the cdist API:
Basically, we are stuffing a shell variable with the contents of a file...
which happens to contain the output from the `kernel_name` explorer...
Before invoking our `manifest` script, **cdist** would have, among other things,
run all **global explorers** on the **target host**,
collected and copied their outputs under a temporary directory on the **master**, and
set a specific environment variable (`$__global`)
to the path of a specifc subdirectory of that temporary working area.
At this point, that file (which contains the kernel name) is sitting there,
ready to be slurped... which can obviously be done from any language
that can access environment variables and read files from the filesystem...
Here's how you could do the same thing in **Python**:
.. code-block:: python
#!/usr/bin/env python
import os
def read_file(path):
content = ""
try:
with open(path, "r") as fd:
content = fd.read().rstrip('\n')
except EnvironmentError:
pass
return content
kernel_name = read_file( os.environ['__global'] + '/explorer/kernel_name' )
# ... do something with kernel_name ...
And in **Perl**, it could look like:
.. code-block:: perl
#!/usr/bin/env perl
sub read_file {
my ($path) = @_;
return unless open( my $fh, $path );
local ($/);
<$fh>
}
my $kernel_name = read_file("$ENV{__global}/explorer/kernel_name");
# ... do something with kernel_name ...
Incidently, this example also helps appreciate some aspects of programming
for the shell... which were designed for this sort of thing in the first place...
A polygot type explorer (in Perl)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here's an imaginary type explorer written in **Perl**,
that ouputs the version of the perl interpreter running on the target host:
.. code-block:: perl
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use English;
print "${PERL_VERSION}\n";
If the path to the intended interpreter can be ascertained, you can
put that down directly on the **shebang**, like so::
#!/usr/bin/perl
However, more often than not, you would want to rely
on the `env` program (`/usr/bin/env`) to
invoke the first interpreter with the given name (`perl`, in this case)
found on the current PATH, like in the above example.
Don't forget to set *execute* permissions on the script file:::
chmod a+x ...
Or else **cdist** will feed it to a shell instance...
which may burn your barn... :-)

126
docs/src/cdist-type.rst
View file

@ -98,29 +98,120 @@ If 'deprecated' marker has no content then general message is printed, e.g.:
How to write a new type
-----------------------
A type consists of
- parameter (optional)
- manifest (optional)
- singleton (optional)
- explorer (optional)
- gencode (optional)
- nonparallel (optional)
Types are stored below cdist/conf/type/. Their name should always be prefixed with
two underscores (__) to prevent collisions with other executables in $PATH.
two underscores (__) to prevent collisions with other executables in :code:`$PATH`.
To implement a new type, create the directory **cdist/conf/type/__NAME**.
To implement a new type, create the directory :file:`cdist/conf/type/{__NAME}`,
either manually or using the helper script `cdist-new-type <man1/cdist-new-type.html>`_
which will also create the basic skeleton for you.
Type manifest and gencode can be written in any language. They just need to be
executable and have a proper shebang. If they are not executable then cdist assumes
they are written in shell so they are executed using '/bin/sh -e' or 'CDIST_LOCAL_SHELL'.
A type consists of the following elements (all of which are currently *optional*):
For executable shell code it is suggested that shebang is '#!/bin/sh -e'.
* some **markers** in the form of **plain files** within the type's directory:
For creating type skeleton you can use helper script
`cdist-new-type <man1/cdist-new-type.html>`_.
.. list-table::
* - :file:`singleton`
- *(optional)*
- A type flagged as a :file:`singleton` may be used **only
once per host**, which is useful for types that can be used only once on a
system.
.. raw:: html
<br/>
Singleton types do not take an object name as argument.
* - :file:`nonparallel`
- (optional)
- Objects of a type flagged as :file:`nonparallel` cannot be run in parallel
when using :code:`-j` option.
.. raw:: html
<br/>
An example of such a type is :program:`__package_dpkg` type
where :program:`dpkg` itself prevents to be run in more than one instance.
* - :file:`install`
- *(optional)*
- A type flagged as :file:`install` is used only with :command:`install` command.
With other :program:`cdist` commands, i.e. :command:`config`, such types are skipped if used.
* - :file:`deprecated`
- *(optional)*
- A type flagged as :file:`deprecated` causes
:program:`cdist` to emit a **warning** whenever that type is used.
.. raw:: html
<br/>
If the file that corresponds to the `deprecated` marker has any content,
then this is used as a custom **deprecation message** for the warning.
* some more **metadata**:
.. list-table::
* - :file:`parameter/\*`
- *(optional)*
- A type may have **parameters**. These must be declared following a simple convention described in `Defining parameters`_, which
permits specifying additional properties for each parameter:
* required or optional
* single-value or multi-value
* string or boolean
It is also possible to give a `default` value for each optional parameter.
* and some **code** (scripts):
.. list-table::
* - :file:`manifest`
- *(optional)*
- :doc:`Type manifest <cdist-manifest>`
* - :file:`explorer/*`
- *(optional)*
- Any number of :doc:`type explorer <cdist-explorer>` scripts may exist under :file:`explorer` subdirectory.
* - :file:`gencode-local`
- *(optional)*
- A script that generates code to be executed *locally* (on master).
* - :file:`gencode-remote`
- *(optional)*
- A script that generates code to be executed *remotely* (on target host).
.. tip::
Each of the above-mentioned scripts can be written in **any scripting language**,
provided that the script is executable and has a proper **shebang**.
For executable shell code, the recommended shebang is :code:`#!/bin/sh -e`.
If a script lacks `execute` permissions, :program:`cdist` assumes
it to be written in **shell** and executes it using
`$CDIST_LOCAL_SHELL` or `$CDIST_REMOTE_SHELL`, if one is defined
for the current execution context (*local* or *remote*),
or else falling back to :code:`/bin/sh -e`.
For any code susceptible to run on remote target hosts
(i.e. **explorers** and any code generated by :code:`gencode-remote`),
it is recommended to stick to **POSIX shell**
in order to minimize requirements on target hosts where they would need to be executed.
For more details and examples, see :doc:`cdist-polyglot`.
.. seealso:: `cdist execution stages <cdist-stages.html>`_
Defining parameters
-------------------
@ -307,6 +398,7 @@ stdin from */dev/null*:
done < "$__object/parameter/foo"
fi
.. _cdist-type#manifest:
Writing the manifest
--------------------
@ -380,6 +472,7 @@ in your type directory:
For example, package types are nonparallel types.
.. _cdist-type#explorers:
The type explorers
------------------
@ -402,6 +495,7 @@ client, like this (shortened version from the type __file):
md5sum < "$destination"
fi
.. _cdist-type#gencode-scripts:
Writing the gencode script
--------------------------

67
docs/src/cdist-why.rst
View file

@ -4,44 +4,65 @@ Why should I use cdist?
There are several motivations to use cdist, these
are probably the most popular ones.
Known language
--------------
No need to learn a new language
-------------------------------
Cdist is being configured in
`shell script <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_script>`_.
Shell script is used by UNIX system engineers for decades.
So when cdist is introduced, your staff does not need to learn a new
When adopting cdist, your staff does not need to learn a new
`DSL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language>`_
or programming language.
or programming language, as cdist can be configured
and extended in **any scripting language**, the recommended one
being `shell scripts <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_script>`_.
Shell scripts enjoy ubiquity: they have been widely used by UNIX system engineers
for decades, and a suitable interpreter (:code:`/bin/sh`) is all but
guaranteed to be widely available on target hosts.
Easy idempotance -- without having to give up control
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the sake of `idempotence <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence>`_, many **contemporary SCMs** choose to ditch the power and versatality of general purpose programming languages, and adopt some form of
declarative `DSL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language>`_ for describing the desired end states on target systems.
:program:`Cdist` takes a quite different approach, enabling *both* `idempotence <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence>`_ *and* a decent level of programming power.
Unlike other SCMs, :program:`cdist` allows you to use a general purpose scripting language (POSIX shell is recommended) for describing the desired end states on target systems, instead of some declarative `DSL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language>`_.
Unlike regular scripting, however, you are not left on your own for ensuring `idempotence <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence>`_. :program:`Cdist` makes this really easy.
It does not matter how many times you "invoke" **cdist types** and in which order: :program:`cdist` will ensure that the actual code associated with each type will be executed only once (in dependency order) which, in turn, may effectively end up becoming a no-op, if the actual state is already the same as the desired one.
.. TODO: It would be great if there were an "architectural overview" page which could be referenced from here.
Powerful language
-----------------
--------------------
Not only is shell scripting widely known by system engineers,
but it is also a very powerful language. Here are some features
which make daily work easy:
Compared to a typical `DSL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language>`_,
shell scripts feature a much more powerful language.
Here are some features which make daily work easy:
* Configuration can react dynamically on explored values
* Ability to dynamically adapt configuration based on information
*explored* from target hosts;
* High level string manipulation (using sed, awk, grep)
* Conditional support (**if, case**)
* Loop support (**for, while**)
* Support for dependencies between cdist types
* Variable expansion
* Support for dependencies between cdist types and objects
If and when needed, it's always possible to simply
make use of **any other scripting language** at your disposal
*(albeit at the expense of adding a dependency on the corresponding interpreter
and libraries)*.
More than shell scripting
-------------------------
If you compare regular shell scripting with cdist, there is one major
difference: When using cdist types,
the results are
`idempotent <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence>`_.
In practise that means it does not matter in which order you
call cdist types, the result is always the same.
Zero dependency configuration management
----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Cdist requires very little on a target system. Even better,
in almost all cases all dependencies are usually fulfilled.
in almost all cases all dependencies are usually already
fulfilled.
Cdist does not require an agent or high level programming
languages on the target host: it will run on any host that
has a **ssh server running** and a POSIX compatible shell

1
docs/src/index.rst
View file

@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ It natively supports IPv6 since the first release.
cdist-type
cdist-types
cdist-explorer
cdist-polyglot
cdist-messaging
cdist-parallelization
cdist-inventory