[blog] no ipv6 2021? not acceptable
This commit is contained in:
		
					parent
					
						
							
								b56d0c29bd
							
						
					
				
			
			
				commit
				
					
						481636751a
					
				
			
		
					 1 changed files with 106 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										106
									
								
								content/u/blog/no-ipv6-in-2021-not-acceptable/contents.lr
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										106
									
								
								content/u/blog/no-ipv6-in-2021-not-acceptable/contents.lr
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
 | 
			
		|||
title: No IPv6 in 2021? Not acceptable.
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
pub_date: 2021-01-09
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
author: Nico Schottelius
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
twitter_handle: NicoSchottelius
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
_hidden: no
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
_discoverable: yes
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
abstract:
 | 
			
		||||
Time is over for legacy-only-IP services.
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
body:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
It's 2021 and it's time to stop using legacy IP (IPv4) only
 | 
			
		||||
services. In 2020 we have already seen quite a rise in IPv6
 | 
			
		||||
connectivity, as well as more and more services emerging IPv6 only.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## The IPv6 community is very active
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The IPv6 community has reported many bugs to products like
 | 
			
		||||
[Steam from
 | 
			
		||||
Valve](https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steam-for-linux/issues/3372),
 | 
			
		||||
[Dockerhub](https://github.com/docker/roadmap/issues/89) and so many
 | 
			
		||||
more that it was not possible for me to list them all in this article.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
As a matter of fact, websites or services that have degraded or
 | 
			
		||||
non-existing IPv6 connectivity [are reported daily on
 | 
			
		||||
Twitter](https://twitter.com/search?q=%23ipv6).
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Time to move on
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
As I can see it from the work at ungleich, 2020 was a very active year
 | 
			
		||||
when it comes to IPv6. But at some point, services that don't work
 | 
			
		||||
with IPv6 are simply not worth caring about anymore.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
While IPv6 [has been defined in
 | 
			
		||||
1998](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2460), it is clear that vendors
 | 
			
		||||
and providers need some time to adapt. But 23 years should have been
 | 
			
		||||
more than enough to migrate.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
For this reason we want to encourage everyone in 2021 to move on, to
 | 
			
		||||
cut off the old legacy IP applications, services or hardware.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## How to move on?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
There are a variety of things everyone of us can do and we have
 | 
			
		||||
collected some easy to take steps.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Setup networks IPv6 only
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
For every new network you setup, set it up with IPv6 only. All current
 | 
			
		||||
mobile phones, tablets and operating systems work in IPv6 only
 | 
			
		||||
networks.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Setup services and applications IPv6 only
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
If you are an application developer, I suggest to develop your
 | 
			
		||||
application with IPv6 first. And if you setup a new service, configure
 | 
			
		||||
IPv6 first and maybe only.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
It's important to understand that setting up something IPv6 only, does
 | 
			
		||||
not mean it will be unreachable from the legacy IP Internet. NAT64 is
 | 
			
		||||
one easy to use technology to solve this problem.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Abandon legacy only
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Whether it's network hardware, applications, Internet providers,
 | 
			
		||||
hosting providers - stop using them if they don't work in IPv6 only
 | 
			
		||||
environments. And let the everyone know that you did so.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
While I am not a fan of shaming anyone, it is still important to let
 | 
			
		||||
vendors know that you have moved on because of the lack of
 | 
			
		||||
IPv6. Otherwise the vendor does not know why they are losing
 | 
			
		||||
customers. When you communicate that you abandon a product or service
 | 
			
		||||
because of lacking proper IPv6 support, I recommend to doing so in a
 | 
			
		||||
clear, but respectful way.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Advocate IPv6 only
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
To be able to spot bugs and to make life for network operators easier,
 | 
			
		||||
I strongly recommend going IPv6 only. Not dualstack, but simply IPv6
 | 
			
		||||
only. If you deploy NAT64 in IPv6 only networks, you can even create
 | 
			
		||||
reachability in both directions.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Many of us network operators, developers and sysadmins are very good
 | 
			
		||||
in implementing things. However, it is important to share the word.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Help each other
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
For about 2 years there is an open, community driven [IPv6
 | 
			
		||||
Chat](https://ipv6.chat). In this chat you can ask others for help,
 | 
			
		||||
ask which alternative products or services to use. Or how to migrate
 | 
			
		||||
to IPv6 only networks. There is also an [IPv6
 | 
			
		||||
reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/) and an [IPv6 group on
 | 
			
		||||
Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/groups/2234775539). Many of the
 | 
			
		||||
RIRs (RIPE, APNIC, Afrinic, LACNIC and ARIN) also offer IPv6 training
 | 
			
		||||
resources.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Migrating to IPv6 is not difficult and there is a community to help
 | 
			
		||||
you with it.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Let's do it, together.
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue