|
|
|
@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ During the benchmarks with up to 10 parallel connections, no
|
|
|
|
|
significant CPU load was registered on the load generator. However |
|
|
|
|
with 20 parallel connections, each of the two iperf |
|
|
|
|
processes\footnote{The client process for sending, the server process for receiving.} partially |
|
|
|
|
spiked to 100\% cpu usage. With 50 parallel connections the cpu |
|
|
|
|
spiked to 100\% CPU usage. With 50 parallel connections the CPU |
|
|
|
|
load of each process hit 100\% often. For this reason we argue that |
|
|
|
|
the benchmark results of the benchmarks with 20 or more parallel |
|
|
|
|
connections might be affected by the load generator limits. While |
|
|
|
|