nico/www.nico.schottelius.org
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add blogentry about the x201

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Nico Schottelius <nico@ikn.schottelius.org>
This commit is contained in:
Nico Schottelius 2010-04-17 14:29:52 +02:00
parent adecf546b7
commit 0ac566028d
1 changed files with 194 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

194
blog/lenovo-x201-with-linux.mdwn Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
[!meta title="Linux on the Lenovo X201"]]
## Introduction
The Lenovo X201, the successor of the X200, has arrived on my desk for some
days. Every new personal computer makes me think about which Linux distribution
to choose.
### Requirements
I started with a list of aspects a good distribution would handle well:
* Straighforward and automatic installation
* Support for crypted home, swap and probably even the root filesystem
* Good package management
* New packages (Linux > 2.6.18 for instance...)
* Easy to integrate own packages into
* Either via an own mirror or into the main distribution
* Good documentation
* Friendly and helpful community
After some minutes thinking about the requirements, I've been aware
that testing all those aspects, and defining them properly, takes more
time than to just give the usual suspects a try.
## Debian
### Lenny via fai
As I'm running Debian here in the [[eth]], my first approach
was to netinstall Debian via fai, which failed with a kernel panic,
because it could not find the root device.
This is normally an indicator, that the network card is unknown,
but debugging it from a netinstall is not so easy, why I decided
to give the installation from an usb stick a try.
### Lenny via usb stick
Firstly I put the Debian Lenny Installer 5.0.2 via
zcat ~nico/boot.img.gz > /dev/sdd
onto the usb stick. Booting the installer worked, but
it did not find any network interface, either.
Well, we all know that Lenny, as being Debian stable currently,
is almost outdated when it's released, so let's give Debian
testing a chance.
### Squeeze
I remember that installing Debiang testing means to retrieve
the installer from some subpage on [debian.org](http://www.debian.org),
that contains the **debian-installer**. As usual, it cannot be easily
found by selecting the usual interesting links on debian.org.
A [search via google for debian installer](http://www.google.com/search?q=debian%20installer]
resulted in the
[correct link for the debian installer](http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/).
It has been alarming that the
[same search on debian.org](http://search.debian.org/cgi-bin/omega?P=debian+installer&DEFAULTOP=or&HITSPERPAGE=10&language=en) does *not* result in the correct result on the first
result page!
Using the
[Debian Squeeze Alpha1 release](http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz) of the debian installer resulted in a
funny, though not very productive installation:
* When selecting the language English, country Switzerland, the
locale ch_DE.UTF-8 not selectable!
* The Keymap [Neo 2.0](http://www.neo-layout.org/) not in list of available layouts.
* The installer cannot find the iso (Well, there's none, it was started from an usb stick...)
* "Detect network hardware" did not find any ethernet card.
Ok, no Debian for the X201 currently.
## Ubuntu
I am currently running Ubuntu on the X200, so giving it a try
on the X201, too.
### 9.10 Beta2
Beta2 is out, what's more loved than early betas and alphas?
I was trying to write the ISO (!) to a usb stick via **usb-creator-gtk**,
which fails with the following kernel messages:
[1320073.833304] end_request: I/O error, dev sdd, sector 0
[1320073.845771] sd 72:0:0:0: [sdd] Device not ready
[1320073.845777] sd 72:0:0:0: [sdd] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[1320073.845786] sd 72:0:0:0: [sdd] Sense Key : Not Ready [current]
[1320073.845795] sd 72:0:0:0: [sdd] Add. Sense: Medium not present
[1320073.845804] end_request: I/O error, dev sdd, sector 0
[1320073.845829] unable to read partition table
Writing to a SD-Card however worked (although: reproducing that made
usb-creator-gtk more often fail than succeed).
Happily I can select the Neo 2.0 keyboard layout during the installation,
but not encrypt volumes in the desktop installer, because it's only
supported with the alternate installation, which I think is a major fault:
Dear Ubuntu developers, include encryption via dm-crypt/cryptsetup
into your desktop installation, please.
The enhanced privacy is worth the added complexity!
The installer detected the network card and after the reboot wireless
lan was working perfectly within the installed gnome desktop. And as
a extra bonus for me, also real transparency of terminals was working!
On the other hand, I've a shiny new Ubuntu installation which is probably
not really what I want: I never use gnome and gdm is fine, but not really
needed.
But well, the main reason to give another distribution a try, is that
there's a new kid on the block:
## Archlinux
Archlinux was brought to my attention some time ago, as it is
the first distribution, that includes [[ccollect|software/ccollect]]
(not in the main, but aur repo).
Having a look at archlinux, there are some points that straightly coming
to attention:
* Arch is x86 only (32 and 64 bit, though)
* It does not use .rpm, nor .deb packages
(Slackware users, do you feel reminded? :-)
* KISS (keep it simple and stupid)
* At least one distribution understands why others have so many problems.
* Least changes to upstream packages possible
The last point is a very interesting one for
[[me, as a FOSS developer|about/foss]], because it ensures that
problems are reported back to me and not corrected elsewhere.
Dear arch developers, thanks for that decision!
For more information, have a look at
[The Arch Way](http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/The_Arch_Way).
### 2009.08
Once again, written the installer to an usb stick, booting
and - guessed it - the installer does not detect the network interface.
Ok, there must be something like Debian testing, some kind
of snapshot, daily or whatever release.
### 2010-04-05 testing image
After I had been searching around, I found
[an entry in the the forum](http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=739859)
and got a hint on [IRC](irc://irc.freenode.org/#archlinux) that
there are [testing ISO images](http://build.archlinux.org/isos/)
available.
The interesting thing is, the iso image can be copied
directly to an usb stick, because grub is being used!
The installer detected the network card and I gave
the auto prepare disk setup a chance, which creates partitions for
* /boot (ext2!),
* swap,
* / and
* /home.
Interesting, but not what I would choose, as there no need for
/boot on x86 for a long time
([see lba32 option for lilo](http://www.google.com/url?q=lilo%20 lba32)).
It also warned me, after I recreated the partition table, that there
is no /boot partition.
Dear arch developers, why do you depend so much on /boot?
But in general, the arch installer can be used straightforwarded and
it says what it does (really like that). The encryption support is
a bit strange, as it does not prepare the crypttab config, which
could easibly be integrated into the installer.
Arch has an easy integration of crypttab into the boot process,
but there are two drawbacks:
* Arch does not support Neo 2.0 keyboard layout
* And the keyboar layout is loaded ***after*** I was asked for the
passphrase of the crypted devices.
At the end, Archlinux installed fine on the X201 and I keep on using
it, to give the distribution in general a try.