0c0b542b22
Signed-off-by: Nico Schottelius <nico@bento.schottelius.org>
24 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
24 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
[[!meta title="LXC still insecure (since 2011)"]]
|
|
|
|
For a customer of mine I was researching whether
|
|
we could use [LXC](http://linuxcontainers.org/) for
|
|
virtualisation.
|
|
The customer is migrating to Debian 7,
|
|
[which does not contain OpenVZ anymore](https://wiki.debian.org/OpenVz).
|
|
|
|
Although the
|
|
[Debian template bug](http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/5102) is still not fixed, I first thought it would still
|
|
be usable when writing our own templates. But it turns
|
|
out that LXC still allows to
|
|
[execute code as root on the host since 2011](http://blog.bofh.it/debian/id_413).
|
|
|
|
More background information for those of you who are currently considering
|
|
LXC:
|
|
|
|
* [Ubuntu / User Namespaces in Linux](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserNamespace)
|
|
* [Gentoo Wiki](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/LXC#MAJOR_Temporary_Problems_with_LXC_-_READ_THIS)
|
|
* [Debian Bug Report](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680469)
|
|
|
|
So for the moment my recommendation is [QEMU](http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page) (KVM has been merged back into QEMU!).
|
|
|
|
[[!tag lxc vm unix]]
|